Jump to content

User talk:UtherSRG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Email this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Utherbot)


zOMG

[edit]
zOMG
I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk

WikiProject Mammals Notice Board

[edit]

Happy holidays!

[edit]

Padshah UtherSRG 2024

[edit]

You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"

What own words? What do mean?

  • What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talkcontribs)

Jishnu Raghavan

[edit]

Hi. As per your suggestion, I have wrote the article in my sandbox. Kindly note that some of the content has been translated from Malayalam Wikipedia and please advise me the next steps toward a publishing it to mainspace. Thilsebatti (talk) 13:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thilsebatti: See my reply to Omhari 1 above with regard to tagging the sandbox as a draft. That will provide you a button you can use to request a review of your draft. You should also take a look at {{Translated page}} and place that on the talk of your sandbox. Note that it needs the appropriate parameters for language code and source page name. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information, but I'm already well aware of these steps. I was not asking about this. The article's title is protected in mainspace. I myself is an experienced new page reviewer. But I'm experiencing this kind of situation for the first time. If I tag this as a draft, could you review it yourself? Thilsebatti (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will not review it. You can wait for the review to happen along with all the other folks waiting for a review. If an AFC reviewer finds the draft acceptable, they can find an admin to assist with the move. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article can be only moved to mainspace by an admin. So how the reviewers without admin rights will be able to publish it to mainspace? Thilsebatti (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, ARC reviewers know how to find an admin. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you haven't tagged its talk page with the {{translated page}} tag. You need to do that. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is more than a coincidence this was declined a few days ago, then the above discussion, and now this after your rejection. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: I agree. I put up an SPI for the expected master, but no match. Might be a new UPE farm this was handed off to... - UtherSRG (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I think it is likely another firm at this point since the one has failed repeatedly. Maybe a one-off on Upwork or something. I have not been there in a while but going to start paying attention on the freelance sites again. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Please delete this draft if G7 applies. I do not wish to be falsely accused of any UPI or sockpuppetry. I noticed that you opened an SPI against me shortly after I requested that the draft to be undeleted. I was only attempting to improve the site and had no intention of assisting any socks or UPE farm. Your above comment might be a new UPE farm this was handed off to (if aimed at me) is disheartening. Finally after thoroughly investigating the situation, I've concluded that one editor has taken this subject personally and does not want this article ever to be published. Thanks and best regards. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It will go stale and be automatically deleted. No action required. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Satanic Nightjar (01:22, 8 October 2024)

[edit]

Hello! I'm just wondering what I should do if an article already has a citation for a specific website, but there is other information on that website (a different page for example) that should also be cited as well. Should I treat it like a separate citation? Or should I do something else entirely? Thanks in advance. --Satanic Nightjar (talk) 01:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Individual pages of a website should be treated as different references, as they have different URLs. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Satanic Nightjar (talk) 02:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you clear my Astrochelys edit?

[edit]

Can you please stop deleting those extinct species I added on that page that I was talking about 216.245.64.76 (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were not appropriate. You must cite references when adding new information. You must use appropriate grammar and formatting. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Suddhadhara Krishnadas (14:50, 11 October 2024)

[edit]

Hi . I wish to create an article on a topic not available on Wikipedia . My account is 3 days old . Please guide me ,how to publish . --Suddhadhara Krishnadas (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Suddhadhara Krishnadas: I have placed some helpful links on your talk page. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you Suddhadhara Krishnadas (talk) 14:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rhizome

[edit]

A rhizome is a stem but if you do not belive me follow the linked word. Hardyplants (talk) 06:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]